Position Sizing Impact on Returns [TLT Iron Condor Backtest]

In this episode we use our new backtesting software to observe the effect different position sizing has on the returns of an iron condor.
Position Sizing Impact on Returns [TLT Iron Condor Backtest]
Kirk Du Plessis
May 25, 2017

I've said it for years, position sizing matters in a high probability system. Much more so than you would believe and today's show is the first in a new mini-series we are doing leading up to the launch of our new backtesting software. Inside we'll cover a case study using and iron condor backtest we ran on TLT including the impact on returns that altering the position size had on the portfolio.

Key Points From Today's Show:

Weekly Iron Condor in TLT

  • Set the trade up to make weekly entries every 40 days, averaging 40 days to expiration.
  • There may be some weeks that have no entries, and rarely any overlap between trades.
  • Overall allocation in the first run was at 50%, which really impacts the profitability of the trade.
  • There was no IV rank filter, and we just made as many trades as we could.
  • Took profits at 50%, and there was no stop loss or adjustments.
  • Selling the 20 delta calls on the short side, and the 20 delta puts on the short side, creating an expected 60% win rate.

Results:

  • This iron condor lost compared to the S&P 500.
  • It had a negative 67% return over the testing period.
  • The number one reason why this trade lost was because of over allocation.
  • Taking profits early, and IV's over expectation, we still won at 81%.
  • The killer is the drawdown that was associated with high levels of allocation.
  • The sequence of returns created an impossible situation to recover from.

*Much more important to have slow, steady gains in your portfolio as opposed to big swings and big movements in your account.

Tweaks and Adjustments:

  • Reset the strategy and adjusted the overall allocation from 50% to 30%.
  • Used the same exact setup - 40 days to expiration, no IV rank, taking profits at 50%, no stop loss, etc.
  • Just entered fewer trades for the portfolio size -- instead of doing five tickers, do three.

Results:

  • Went from a negative 67% return to a 6.86% return.
  • The max drawdown was reduced to 45%, which happened in the middle of the cycle.
  • This shows how important small tweaks in allocation can be, as well as the importance of not having large drawdowns early on in your portfolio.
  • When your sequence of returns are not correct and you are over-allocated, so you lose early big, which sets you up for disaster.

Trade smarter with automation